Both MediaTek MT8788 and Snapdragon 680 are ARM-based mobile processors. The main area of their activities revolves around the Central Processing Unit of Smartphones or Tabs. Understanding their performances would help us know how the devices’ speed, efficiency, and overall performance. These pieces of information will help us evaluate one’s potential above the other.
MediaTek MT8788 vs Snapdragon 680 is a comparative analysis of these sets’ contributions in the current Digitech world. In this article, we have given a brief overview of the products. In the later part, we mentioned their CPU Infrastructure, GPU details, and performance analytics. Comparing their capabilities and performances will help you choose the most befitting one for you.
Overview Of MediaTek MT8788
The MediaTek MT8788 is an ARM-based upper mainstream Security Operation Center (SOC). It is used in Smartphones, mainly the Androids. The research team introduced the processor in 2018, but it was launched in the market on 15th July 2020.
The manufacturer uses the 12nm FINFET procedure in the manufacturing of MediaTek MT8788. These devices also are equipped with 4x big ARM Cortex-A73 cores and 4x small ARM Cortex-A53 cores in two clusters, i.e. the bigLITTLE. The small ARM Cortex-A53 cores help in the energy economy. These devices can work with a maximum frequency of 2 GHZ.
The processor equips ARM Mali-G72MP3 GPU. It also incorporates an integrated AI processing unit.
Overview Of Snapdragon 680
Snapdragon 680 is designed and developed by Qualcomm. The company uses its innovative design and guided manufacturing process to ensure Multimedia uses for longer periods. Snapdragon 680 was purposefully built to facilitate extended gameplay, rich audio, brilliant photography, and video streamlining.
The manufacturing team works with the aim to ensure power efficiency and seamless interactions. The manufacturer introduces the Qualcomm Adreno 610 GPU, and Qualcomm Kryo 265 CPU in the 6nm process technology. Such introduction guarantees long-lasting for the processor too. The use of Qualcomm 3.0 Quick Charge technology ensures fast recharge of the processors.
Comparison Of Performance – MediaTek MT8788 vs Snapdragon 680
Differences
| Feature | MediaTek MT8788 | Snapdragon 680 |
| Architecture Implementation | MediaTek uses the stock ARM cortex CPU microarchitectures without modifications. It was released on 15th July 2020. | The applicator designs and uses tailored ARM CPU cores under Kyro branding in Snapdragon 680. Though based on the ARM Cortex microarchitecture, these are modified to meet the intended specifications and differentiations of Snapdragon chips.The product was launched on 15th October 2021. |
| GPU Cores | MediaTek MT8788 uses Mali GPU. This is an ARM-certified GPU model. The ARM-453 model stresses on energy efficiency. | Quallcomm has designed and developed the GPU cores. The product, Adreno, is now a highly-demanded core. |
| Clock Speed | The clock speed of MediaTek MT8788 can reach up to 2.0 GHZ. | The clock speed of Snapdragon 680 is 2.4 GHZ. Its better clock speed has enabled it to manage multiple applications. |
| GPU Details | The Mali G72 MP3 GPU is associated with the MediaTek MT8788. It enhances visual performance of the sets. Smooth graphics ensure an enjoyable gaming experience. | The Adreno 610 GPU, used in the Snapdragon 680, also enhances visual performance. Apart from this, the technology also enables the users to enjoy innovative games.. |
| Manufacturing Process | The MediaTek MT8788 uses a 12nm FinFET process. Inclusion of advanced methodologies ensures better power efficiency and thermal management. The compact design fits these into various mobile devices without compromising performance. | The manufacturer uses 6nm process technology in the Snapdragon 680. Quallcomm has developed this advanced technology. The team of research associates have ensured their fitness on different mobile devices. Performance level stays intact. |
| Power Efficiency | The innovative architecture and manufacturing process of MediaTek MT8788 has helped in efficient power uses.. Batteries thus last for longer periods. The devices thus can be used throughout the day without requiring frequent recharging. | Kyro architecture guarantees calculated power consumption, thus reducing the cost of electricity to a great extent. The Kyro 265 Silver Cores demonstrate a better power economy than the MT8788 variety. |
| Thermal Management | The innovative design of the chips causes minimal heat generation. Mobile sets thus remain cool. It hinders performance throttling that can affect user experience. | The Snapdragon 680 has excelled much better in terms of heat management. Both the devices manage heat well. Yet, the Snapdragon 680 proved to be a better option for long-time and high-task users. |
| Price | Chips from Mediatek MT8788 come at budget-friendly prices. These sets are ideal for people who like to enjoy comfort in usage without panicking about money. | Snapdragon 680 varieties come at costlier rates. But, its overall performances bring justification for the extra bucks paid by the buyers |
Similarities
These two varieties exhibit various similarities in their behaviour. Let us examine:
| MediaTek MT8788 | Snapdragon 680 |
| The product is based on ARM Architecture. | A similar clause applies to this product too. |
| MediaTek MT8788 was designed and developed by MediaTek by following the ARM guidelines. Then they outsourced the product to the capable vendors. | Snapdragon does not own or operate but has developed and processed the Snapdragon 680. Some other companies take the finished product from them to sell in the market. |
| Several outsourcing companies gather the product from them for selling in the market. | Companies in the business of mobiles purchase Snapdragon 680 processors. They put these chips into the mobile sets and sell them in the market |
.
Customer’s Feedback Analysis
- Customers who spend more time on gaming sites in their smartphones prefer the Snapdragon 680 for its ability to provide extended gameplay.
- High-task users also praise the Snapdragon 680 for its longer battery durability.
- Curiously, customers who opt for multitasking through mobile prefer MediaTek MT8788. The Snapdragon 680 has better speed and is thus apt to perform multitasking better than the MediaTek variety.
- MediaTek MT8788 is the automatic choice for people who want to go for affordable options.
- Users also say that the MediaTek MT8788 processors can provide better camera resolutions.
Inference
The MediaTek MT8788 vs Snapdragon 680 comparison chart reveals that the Snapdragon 680 sets surpass the MediaTek MT8788 ones in many respects. The former depends on the company’s architecture and technology, while the latter relies on ARM-certified architecture and models. The higher speed of the Snapdragon enables multitasking; it is not the case for the MT8788 variety. People, however, consider the MT8788 variety for multitasking in their own ways. Kyro infrastructure induced in the Snapdragon 680 variety also enables better heat and power management.
The MediaTek MT8788 sets might be an option for people with budget constraints. The price of the Snapdragon 680 variety is slightly higher. However, its performance justifies the higher cost to the buyers.
The Snapdragon 680 sets make a fine balance between their prices and performance. It is not the best smartphone in the market. Yet, gaming enthusiasts and high-taskers can rely on this.
The MediaTek Helio G99 is a new introduction to these sets. With the introduction of innovative features, it can provide much more balance between high-tasking and extended gaming. Like the Snapdragon 680, it puts a symmetry over price and performance too.
Mediatek MT8788 offers solidarity in construction. It is an affordable option too. But, the Snapdragon 680 sets are at much better positions in terms of performance, battery life expectancy, and Android updates. These are ahead in providing Custom ROM support too.
Yes, the Snapdragon sets tend to get overheated after a certain time.
Yes, the FINFET technology supports durability. Using these sets by following the basic guidelines can hold them for more than 5 years.
